Comments on: Video: Controversial Foul on Game 2

By: mike

mike — Fri, 05 Mar 2010 04:53:46 +0000

the players must be flexible in every game.remember we are adapting fiba rules..to be competitive on intl games.mas manipis ang dikit dun foul na.if we want to win a champioships we must play sa intl standard.

By: erwin

erwin — Thu, 04 Mar 2010 03:24:52 +0000

Baliktarin natin ang situation.
If Kerby was an Alaska player and they call a foul on a Purefoods defender, sasabihin ba ng Purefoods, right call?
I’m sure gumugulong na si Ryan Gregorio sa hardwood sa kaka-complain.
Let the players win games and not the referees.

Now, game 3 when Miller drove to the basket, no fouls?!!! Even if it caused him to get a bloodied-nose? C’mon, Purefoods, you know better than that.

By: thanchuy

thanchuy — Mon, 01 Mar 2010 01:02:34 +0000

may foul ba yun? definetely yes pero manipis lang ang contact.. dapat bang tawagin yun? in that situation hindi dapat bakit? kasi manipis lang.. but on the side of the referees they were calling it all season long on that manipis foul… and kerby was just rewarded for being aggresive during that time.. situation on game 3 is the same from game 2 only the refs were letting it go… thats the break of the game